Religion defines the spiritual, moral, and
even secular lives of billions worldwide. Although the extent and
modality differs from religion to religion and even from individual to
individual, religion is generally considered a frame of reference to life and
living. Modern social values including the legal and educational systems are
influenced by the norms and
traditions of religions. This is clearly observed in Ethiopia where
believers are usually actively living their religious values, norms and
traditions. It is thus seminal to talk about religion as related to social
cohesion and development generally.
Ethiopian Television
(ETV) released a documentary on religious tolerance, referring to Islam and
Christianity. I watched both parts of the release (now available as several video
clips on YouTube) and wanted to share my reflections, as there are some
issues that need further deliberations. First, I identified the strong sides of
the documentary followed by the summary of the major issues that look quite
slippery and even misleading. This is not however a professional review of the
documentary.
Google pictures
Strengths
The documentary has
several strengths that are related to its intention and the process of making
the documentary itself. One, the very idea of promoting tolerance of any nature
and kind including religious should be among the top priorities of a national
TV. It is commendable to document historical and contemporary developments that
affect Ethiopia and the many religions thereof. Effective and unbiased accounts
of how religions lived together in noticeable tolerance is very much
instrumental for sustaining social cohesion.
Two, the process of
making the documentary itself has various qualities, of which ordinary and
expert people from Islam, Orthodox, Catholic, and Protestant religions took
part. This would potentially enable a strong consideration of different
perspectives.
Three, the extent of tolerance
and collaboration between Muslims and Orthodoxes is quite amazing; they
together build mosques and churches by contributing in cash and in kind. This
is something we could find nowhere but in Ethiopia. ETV emphasized this part well
and is indeed a point worth celebration. Not least useful is the title itself, “One
country many religions”. It is concise, powerful and summative although one
finds several contents that challenge the significance of the title.
Weaknesses
and Limitations
The documentary has several,
intended or unintended that might be though, weaknesses and limitations that
left unwanted implications to viewers. To me the most important ones include
the following.
Living
the past?
The documentary gives due emphasis
to past skirmishes between Muslims and
Christians and to the unfair treatment of the former by Christian regimes. That
left damaging tone to the title, which was intended to preach smooth relations
between believers. Although it is not realistic to completely ignore past
injustices, elaborating that in a film intended to create positive impact does
hurt a lot. A documentary of this nature would have been much benefited by
focusing primarily on past, present and future tolerance and collaboration
between Muslims and Christians.
Representation or expertise?
Those interviewed by ETV
are scholars and believers of the two
religions and government officers. While the integrity of their thoughts and
opinions seem little challengeable (primarily because only tiny parts of their
views were selected and presented and without context), it is unclear whether
they represent official positions of the two religions and that of the
government on the wide-variety of issues raised. Do the accounts provided by
the Muslim scholars, who were not linked to any official office, for instance
represent the views of Islam in Ethiopia? And how about the Christian
interviewees and government guys? From the documentary alone, it is not
possible to discriminate individual viewpoints from the viewpoints of the two
grand religions. This leaves confusion when it comes to acting or otherwise the
recommendations of the participants. Careful distinction between the official
positions of the religions and that of the government would have been very much
helpful.
Terrorist or opponent?
A
significant part of the documentary dwells on how "some individuals and
groups" in both religions are creating terror in the name of their
religions. This is I must say the most confusing and unhelpful part of the
work. It is generally claimed that those individuals and groups, who are hardly
identified by their names or affiliations, take extreme sides and are too
narrow to acknowledge the presence and right of other religions. The abusive
usage of the term terrorist is
manifested in several ways. One, a number of religious books written by Muslim
and Christian scholars are well displayed, telling the viewers that all those
books are produced by terrorists. Books written for scholastic purposes and for
defending religions are not excused. This is in sharp contradiction to the
right of citizens to freely express ideas in all ways available and peacefully.
I for instance saw books which I read that do not have a word and implication related
to terrorism and/or extremism.
Two, even
the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Synod in exile is implicated with terror and
extremism. An Archbishop is shown condemning the government in Ethiopia, for it
is trying to open a sugar factory in the holly place, Waldiba monastery. How
could opposing government’s ill-planned projects be equated to terrorism and
extremism? And effort is made to show to the viewers that the recent demonstrations
and protests of Ethiopian Muslims are hijacked by terrorists. While I have no
evidence that indicate otherwise, ETV has not the relevant and adequate information
in support of their claim either. The implication ETV wanted to leave is that
anyone who opposes government decisions and policies is to be labeled a terrorist
and/or extremist. This confusion is too huge to be made by a national TV, from
which we all expect the highest degree of responsibility and work ethics. It
just abuses the overall thrust of the documentary, at least as reflected in its
title.
Conclusion
ETV's "One country many
religions" documentary is absolutely timely and interesting. It highlighted
how Muslims and Christians lived in peace and in collaboration for centuries.
The problem begins when recent conflicts are explained in terms of terrorism
and extremism. While every Ethiopian, I must assume, denounces terrorism of any
form, declaring its presence in Islam and Christian religions with no effort of
specification is too big to swallow. If there are terrorists, it must be the duty of the government and the public at large to bring them to justice and prove them guilty. Until that is done, tagging individuals and groups as terrorists is counterproductive and has no legal and moral jurisdiction. Interestingly, Ethiopian
Muslims and Christians need neither a national TV nor radio to sustain their
age-old tolerance and collaborations. They just watched each other, and not any
media, compassionately and will do so for ever.
bravo. Caleb.
ReplyDelete